TennisEdge's AI bot is backing E. Gorgodze (moneyline) in E. Gorgodze vs L. Jeanjean (Wimbledon on 2026-06-24).
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Gorgodze | L. Jeanjean |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
49.6% | 50.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
48.3% | 51.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
48.9% | 51.1% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
26.9% | 73.1% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Gorgodze | clay | 1522 | 120–114 | 234 |
| L. Jeanjean | clay | 1691 | 111–70 | 181 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 22, 2026.
L. Jeanjean leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 24, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | L. Jeanjean | 2 - 0 |
| L | Y. Kabbaj | 0 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | A. Mintegi Del Olmo | 2 - 1 | July 20, 2026 |
| W | A. Soboleva | 0 - 1 | July 12, 2026 |
| W | T. Kostovic | 2 - 0 | July 11, 2026 |
| W | J. Riera | 2 - 0 | July 10, 2026 |
| L | M. Frech | 2 - 0 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| W | L. Zhu | 2 - 1 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | M. Sherif | 2 - 0 | July 11, 2026 |
| W | A. Tubello | 2 - 1 | July 10, 2026 |
| W | F. Jones | 1 - 2 | July 9, 2026 |
All June 24, 2026 results & picks →
The model consensus projects a 42.3% win probability for Gorgodze, creating a significant 15.4% edge over the market's devigged price of 26.9%. While Gorgodze faces fatigue concerns with 4 matches in the last 14 days, the market trend indicates Jeanjean is being 'chased' (over-priced) despite her 'Strong Specialist' profile typically favoring Clay, whereas Gorgodze's 'All-Court' style is better suited for Grass variance. The value on the underdog at 3.50 odds is substantial enough to justify the risk.