TENNISEDGE.GG

T. Preston vs Y. Starodubtseva — Prediction & Analysis

Paris · Paris - 1/16-finals · May 12, 2026 · 10:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in T. Preston vs Y. Starodubtseva (Paris on 2026-05-12) — the market is efficient, with Y. Starodubtseva favoured at 1.30.

Surface clay Odds T. Preston 3.40 · Y. Starodubtseva 1.30

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: T. Preston · Y. Starodubtseva · head-to-head record · Paris

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method T. Preston Y. Starodubtseva
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
32.5% 67.5%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
31.9% 68.1%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
32.2% 67.8%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
27.7% 72.3%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
T. Preston hard1773 139–62201
Y. Starodubtseva hard1636 69–53122

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 1, 2026.

Head to head

T. Preston leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 12, 2026ParisclayY. Starodubtseva2 - 0
Nov. 28, 2025W75 PlayfordhardT. Preston2 - 0
Feb. 23, 2024Puerto Vallarta Challenger WomenhardT. Preston2 - 0

Recent form

T. Preston

W M. Inglis 0 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
W M. Sawangkaew 2 - 1 July 31, 2026
W P. Hon 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W H. Dart 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W H. Kaji 0 - 2 July 29, 2026

Y. Starodubtseva

L M. Joint 1 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
L S. Stephens 1 - 2 July 28, 2026
L A. Blinkova 1 - 2 June 30, 2026
L A. Zakharova 1 - 2 June 23, 2026
L E. Navarro 1 - 2 June 17, 2026

All May 12, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used