TENNISEDGE.GG

N. Osaka vs I. Swiatek — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · WTA Rome - 1/8-finals · May 11, 2026 · 18:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in N. Osaka vs I. Swiatek (Rome on 2026-05-11) — the market is efficient, with I. Swiatek favoured at 1.28.

Surface clay Odds N. Osaka 3.75 · I. Swiatek 1.28

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: N. Osaka · I. Swiatek · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method N. Osaka I. Swiatek
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
20.3% 79.7%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
21.0% 79.0%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
47.2% 52.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
29.5% 70.5%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
25.4% 74.6%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
N. Osaka hard1920 80–36116
I. Swiatek hard2021 184–49233

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 1, 2026.

Head to head

I. Swiatek leads 3–1 over 4 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 11, 2026RomeclayI. Swiatek2 - 0
May 29, 2024WTA French OpenclayI. Swiatek2 - 1
April 2, 2022MiamihardI. Swiatek2 - 0
Aug. 9, 2019TorontohardN. Osaka2 - 0

Recent form

N. Osaka

L A. Eala 0 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
W E. Cocciaretto 1 - 2 July 31, 2026
W A. Krueger 0 - 1 July 29, 2026
L K. Muchova 0 - 2 July 7, 2026
W A. Sabalenka 0 - 2 July 5, 2026

I. Swiatek

L A. Eala 2 - 0 July 4, 2026
W Ka. Pliskova 0 - 2 July 2, 2026
W T. Townsend 1 - 2 June 30, 2026
L E. Navarro 1 - 2 June 24, 2026
L M. Kostyuk 2 - 0 May 31, 2026

All May 11, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used