TENNISEDGE.GG

J. Sinner vs A. Pellegrino — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · ATP Rome - 1/8-finals · May 12, 2026 · 15:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. Sinner vs A. Pellegrino (Rome on 2026-05-12) — the market is efficient, with J. Sinner favoured at 1.01.

Surface clay Odds J. Sinner 1.01 · A. Pellegrino 16.25

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: J. Sinner · A. Pellegrino · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method J. Sinner A. Pellegrino
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
72.2% 27.8%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
88.1% 11.9%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
81.0% 19.0%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
80.5% 19.5%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
94.1% 5.9%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
J. Sinner hard2299 219–45264
A. Pellegrino clay1724 175–135310

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 29, 2026.

Head to head

J. Sinner leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 12, 2026RomeclayJ. Sinner2 - 0
March 31, 2019Santa Margherita Di PulaclayJ. Sinner2 - 0

Recent form

J. Sinner

W A. Zverev 3 - 1 July 12, 2026
W N. Djokovic 3 - 0 July 10, 2026
W J-L. Struff 3 - 0 July 7, 2026
W S. Mochizuki 3 - 0 July 5, 2026
W J. Brooksby 3 - 0 July 3, 2026

A. Pellegrino

L T. Monteiro 2 - 0 July 30, 2026
W C. A. Caniato 0 - 2 July 28, 2026
L G. Bueno 1 - 2 July 19, 2026
W J. D. Silva 2 - 0 July 18, 2026
L A. Rublev 2 - 1 July 16, 2026

All May 12, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used