TennisEdge's AI bot is backing I. Shymanovich (moneyline) in I. Shymanovich vs V. Golubic (Wimbledon on 2026-06-29).
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | I. Shymanovich | V. Golubic |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
39.1% | 60.9% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
40.4% | 59.6% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
55.6% | 44.4% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
39.4% | 60.6% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
25.4% | 74.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. Shymanovich | clay | 1569 | 86–52 | 138 |
| V. Golubic | hard | 1724 | 118–68 | 186 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated June 1, 2026.
V. Golubic leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | V. Golubic | 2 - 1 |
| L | K. Volynets | 0 - 2 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | A. Raina | 2 - 0 | July 27, 2026 |
| W | R. Brantmeier | 2 - 0 | July 27, 2026 |
| L | M. Stoiana | 1 - 2 | July 9, 2026 |
| W | H. Kinoshita | 2 - 0 | July 8, 2026 |
| W | K. Birrell | 0 - 2 | Aug. 2, 2026 |
| L | K. Volynets | 2 - 1 | July 27, 2026 |
| L | J. Paolini | 2 - 0 | July 2, 2026 |
| W | I. Shymanovich | 1 - 2 | June 30, 2026 |
| L | E. Navarro | 2 - 0 | June 20, 2026 |
All June 29, 2026 results & picks →
MATCH: I. Shymanovich (A) vs V. Golubic (B) — Wimbledon, grass, 1/64-finals (2026-06-30) ODDS: A 3.75 (devig 25.4%) | B 1.28 (devig 74.5%) | value pick A, edge +13.9% MODELS (P[A win]): ELO 39.1% | ML 40.4% | Serve/Return 55.6% | blended 39.4%. Market devig only 25.4%. All three sub-models sit ABOVE market on A — consensus disagreement in A's favor. FORM A (Shymanovich): QUALIFIED at Wimbledon — won 3 rounds 06-23/24/25, incl. SF DOM over Minnen (1741, Strong) 6-4 6-2 and a 3-set qualifying-final title 06-25. Earlier won Ilkley title 06-08 with DOM over Ngounoue (1753, Strong) 6-3 6-3. Genuinely sharp on grass with quality wins vs Strong opponents. FORM B (Golubic): Won Nottingham title 06-14 (DOM over Kenin), but campaign was grindy (3-setters vs Sonmez 1734, Kenin 1630, Erjavec 1647) and opposition only Avg/Strong. LOST her last match 06-20 (SF to Navarro 1807, 7-6 6-2). Rough clay swing before grass (string of losses Apr-May). FATIGUE: A — 3 matches/14d, ~264min, last 06-25 (5d rest). B — 6 matches/14d, ~510min, last 06-20 (10d rest). B carried the heavier recent load but now has 10 days off, so live fatigue is roughly neutral; A is match-sharp from qualifying. NARRATIVE: A — TITLE (Wimbledon qualifying) 5d ago, grass → WEAK let-down only (well past peak fatigue, 5d rest). B — lost last out, no title bounce. Venue momentum neutral (main draw, fresh event). VERDICT: Classic hot-qualifier-vs-proven-favorite spot. Market crowns Golubic a heavy 1.28 chalk, but Shymanovich's grass form is real (DOM wins over two Strong opponents in three weeks) and all three models price her at 39-56% vs market 25%. Edge validated qualitatively, not just numerically. BET A for value. Sized below full Kelly (2.0u) given big-underdog variance and Golubic's stronger long-run grass pedigree. Golubic remains the forecast match-winner.