TENNISEDGE.GG

A. Zakharova vs L. Noskova — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · WTA Rome - 1/32-finals · May 7, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Zakharova vs L. Noskova (Rome on 2026-05-07) — the market is efficient, with L. Noskova favoured at 1.08.

Surface clay Odds A. Zakharova 8.00 · L. Noskova 1.08

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: A. Zakharova · L. Noskova · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method A. Zakharova L. Noskova
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
27.7% 72.3%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
18.0% 82.0%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
33.6% 66.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
26.4% 73.6%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
11.9% 88.1%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
A. Zakharova hard1771 168–89257
L. Noskova hard1892 107–53160

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 31, 2026.

Head to head

L. Noskova leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 7, 2026RomeclayL. Noskova2 - 0
Aug. 26, 2022US OpenhardL. Noskova2 - 0
March 5, 2022W25 Nur-SultanhardA. Zakharova2 - 0

Recent form

A. Zakharova

L R. Zarazua 0 - 2 July 31, 2026
W C. Osorio 0 - 2 July 29, 2026
W L. Fruhvirtova 2 - 0 July 27, 2026
L H. Vandewinkel 0 - 2 July 18, 2026
W T. Prozorova 2 - 0 July 17, 2026

L. Noskova

W K. Muchova 1 - 2 July 11, 2026
W M. Kostyuk 0 - 2 July 9, 2026
W E. Mertens 2 - 0 July 8, 2026
W M. Keys 0 - 2 July 6, 2026
W S. Cirstea 1 - 2 July 4, 2026

All May 7, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used