TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Ruzic vs M. Andreeva (Rome on 2026-05-07) — the market is efficient, with M. Andreeva favoured at 1.09.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | A. Ruzic | M. Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
18.5% | 81.5% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
13.7% | 86.3% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
35.8% | 64.2% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
22.6% | 77.4% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
12.4% | 87.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Ruzic | hard | 1784 | 114–50 | 164 |
| M. Andreeva | hard | 1957 | 93–37 | 130 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.
M. Andreeva leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | Rome | clay | M. Andreeva | 2 - 0 |
| W | L. Boisson | 1 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| L | D. Salkova | 0 - 2 | July 20, 2026 |
| L | J. Ostapenko | 2 - 0 | July 1, 2026 |
| W | D. Semenistaja | 2 - 1 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | P. Marcinko | 1 - 2 | June 22, 2026 |
| L | B. Krejcikova | 2 - 1 | July 1, 2026 |
| W | M. Linette | 0 - 2 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | E. Alexandrova | 2 - 0 | June 24, 2026 |
| W | M. Chwalinska | 0 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| W | M. Kostyuk | 0 - 2 | June 4, 2026 |
All May 7, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used