TENNISEDGE.GG

S. Tsitsipas vs G. Mpetshi Perricard — Prediction & Analysis

Geneva · ATP Geneva - 1/16-finals · May 18, 2026 · 10:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in S. Tsitsipas vs G. Mpetshi Perricard (Geneva on 2026-05-18) — the market is efficient, with S. Tsitsipas favoured at 1.36.

Surface clay Odds S. Tsitsipas 1.36 · G. Mpetshi Perricard 3.20

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: S. Tsitsipas · G. Mpetshi Perricard · head-to-head record · Geneva

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method S. Tsitsipas G. Mpetshi Perricard
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
70.2% 29.8%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
81.5% 18.5%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
35.2% 64.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
62.3% 37.7%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
70.2% 29.8%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
S. Tsitsipas hard1815 133–83216
G. Mpetshi Perricard hard1695 83–72155

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 1, 2026.

Head to head

S. Tsitsipas leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 18, 2026GenevaclayS. Tsitsipas2 - 0

Recent form

S. Tsitsipas

W K. Rice 2 - 0 Aug. 1, 2026
L A. De Minaur 2 - 1 July 29, 2026
W R. Collignon 2 - 1 July 19, 2026
W A. Shevchenko 1 - 2 July 18, 2026
W A. Rinderknech 1 - 2 July 17, 2026

G. Mpetshi Perricard

L Y. Hanfmann 3 - 1 June 30, 2026
W R. Bautista-Agut 1 - 2 June 26, 2026
W L. Tien 1 - 2 June 23, 2026
L C. Moutet 1 - 2 June 16, 2026
W A. Kovacevic 0 - 2 June 14, 2026

All May 18, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used