TENNISEDGE.GG

F. Tiafoe vs M. Arnaldi — Prediction & Analysis

French Open · ATP French Open - 1/8-finals · June 1, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in F. Tiafoe vs M. Arnaldi (French Open on 2026-06-01) — the market is efficient, with F. Tiafoe favoured at 1.85.

Surface clay Odds F. Tiafoe 1.85 · M. Arnaldi 2.06

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: F. Tiafoe · M. Arnaldi · head-to-head record · French Open

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method F. Tiafoe M. Arnaldi
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
42.0% 58.0%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
31.6% 68.4%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
63.6% 36.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
45.8% 54.2%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
52.7% 47.3%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
F. Tiafoe hard1866 126–85211
M. Arnaldi clay1861 133–70203

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 28, 2026.

Head to head

M. Arnaldi leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 1, 2026French OpenclayM. Arnaldi3 - 2
April 30, 2025MadridclayM. Arnaldi2 - 0
July 1, 2024ATP WimbledongrassF. Tiafoe3 - 2

Recent form

F. Tiafoe

L T. Atmane 1 - 2 July 28, 2026
L A. Bublik 2 - 3 July 4, 2026
W J. Choinski 3 - 1 July 2, 2026
W T. Atmane 3 - 1 July 1, 2026
W T. Fritz 0 - 2 June 21, 2026

M. Arnaldi

L L. Musetti 0 - 1 July 27, 2026
L D. Dzumhur 2 - 1 July 16, 2026
W F. A. Gomez 1 - 2 July 15, 2026
L Q. Halys 1 - 3 June 30, 2026
L G. Hussey 0 - 2 June 23, 2026

All June 1, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used