TENNISEDGE.GG

C. McNally vs I. Swiatek — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · WTA Rome - 1/32-finals · May 8, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in C. McNally vs I. Swiatek (Rome on 2026-05-08) — the market is efficient, with I. Swiatek favoured at 1.08.

Surface clay Odds C. McNally 7.00 · I. Swiatek 1.08

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: C. McNally · I. Swiatek · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method C. McNally I. Swiatek
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
20.3% 79.7%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
13.4% 86.6%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
64.0% 36.0%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
32.6% 67.4%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
13.4% 86.6%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
C. McNally hard1736 85–66151
I. Swiatek hard2021 184–49233

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.

Head to head

I. Swiatek leads 3–0 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 8, 2026RomeclayI. Swiatek2 - 1
July 3, 2025WimbledongrassI. Swiatek2 - 1
Oct. 7, 2022OstravahardI. Swiatek2 - 0

Recent form

C. McNally

W T. Maria 1 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L K. Liutova 2 - 0 July 31, 2026
W Y. Ma 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W Xiy. Wang 1 - 2 July 28, 2026
L E. Rybakina 0 - 2 July 2, 2026

I. Swiatek

L A. Eala 2 - 0 July 4, 2026
W Ka. Pliskova 0 - 2 July 2, 2026
W T. Townsend 1 - 2 June 30, 2026
L E. Navarro 1 - 2 June 24, 2026
L M. Kostyuk 2 - 0 May 31, 2026

All May 8, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used