TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in T. Gentzsch vs G. Onclin (Stuttgart on 2026-06-06) — the market is efficient, with G. Onclin favoured at 1.44.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | T. Gentzsch | G. Onclin |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
59.7% | 40.3% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
67.0% | 33.0% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
73.4% | 26.6% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
66.7% | 33.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
35.5% | 64.5% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Gentzsch | clay | 1669 | 119–78 | 197 |
| G. Onclin | hard | 1748 | 126–66 | 192 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.
G. Onclin leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 24, 2026 | Tampere | clay | G. Onclin | 2 - 1 |
| W | T. Monteiro | 1 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | M. Dahlin | 1 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | J. Reis Da Silva | 2 - 0 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | G. Onclin | 2 - 1 | July 24, 2026 |
| W | A. Nedic | 1 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| L | D. Dedura | 2 - 1 | July 25, 2026 |
| W | T. Gentzsch | 2 - 1 | July 24, 2026 |
| W | N. Visker | 2 - 0 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | D. Ajdukovic | 2 - 0 | July 20, 2026 |
| L | T. Boogaard | 2 - 1 | July 14, 2026 |
All June 6, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used