TENNISEDGE.GG

S. Ofner vs A. Michelsen — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · ATP Rome - 1/64-finals · May 6, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in S. Ofner vs A. Michelsen (Rome on 2026-05-06) — the market is efficient, with S. Ofner favoured at 1.32.

Surface clay Odds S. Ofner 1.32 · A. Michelsen 3.36

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: S. Ofner · A. Michelsen · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method S. Ofner A. Michelsen
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
71.5% 28.5%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
74.4% 25.6%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
68.0% 32.0%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
71.3% 28.7%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
71.8% 28.2%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
S. Ofner clay1701 100–69169
A. Michelsen hard1895 148–85233

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 21, 2026.

Head to head

S. Ofner leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 7, 2026RomeclayS. Ofner2 - 0
June 27, 2024ATP MallorcagrassS. Ofner2 - 1
Aug. 22, 2023ATP Winston-SalemhardA. Michelsen2 - 0

Recent form

S. Ofner

L J. Fearnley 2 - 0 Aug. 1, 2026
L A. Molcan 2 - 0 July 21, 2026
L T. A. Tirante 0 - 2 July 14, 2026
L D. Rincon 2 - 1 July 8, 2026
W N. Gombos 0 - 2 July 7, 2026

A. Michelsen

W J-L. Struff 2 - 1 Aug. 4, 2026
L T. Fritz 2 - 1 July 31, 2026
W A. Mannarino 2 - 0 July 29, 2026
W M. McDonald 2 - 0 July 28, 2026
W J. Fearnley 2 - 0 July 26, 2026

All May 6, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used