TENNISEDGE.GG

P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · · May 6, 2026 · 15:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo (Rome on 2026-05-06) — the market is efficient, with A. Tabilo favoured at 1.44.

Surface clay Odds P. Carreno-Busta 2.63 · A. Tabilo 1.44

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: P. Carreno-Busta · A. Tabilo · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method P. Carreno-Busta A. Tabilo
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
40.3% 59.7%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
37.4% 62.6%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
50.2% 49.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
42.7% 57.3%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
35.4% 64.6%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
P. Carreno-Busta hard1742 81–51132
A. Tabilo clay1825 125–68193

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Feb. 25, 2026.

Head to head

P. Carreno-Busta leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 6, 2026RomeclayA. Tabilo2 - 0
Oct. 17, 2025OlbiahardP. Carreno-Busta2 - 1
Jan. 1, 2022ATP ATP CuphardP. Carreno-Busta2 - 0

Recent form

P. Carreno-Busta

L L. van Assche 2 - 1 July 23, 2026
W V. Gaubas 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
L C. Ugo Carabelli 1 - 2 July 15, 2026
W M. Dodig 0 - 2 July 14, 2026
L R. Jodar 3 - 2 July 2, 2026

A. Tabilo

L R. Jodar 2 - 1 Aug. 2, 2026
W B. Shelton 2 - 1 Aug. 1, 2026
W T. Atmane 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W T. Griekspoor 2 - 1 July 27, 2026
L T. Torres 0 - 2 July 22, 2026

All May 6, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used