TENNISEDGE.GG

F. Auger-Aliassime vs A. Davidovich Fokina — Prediction & Analysis

Wimbledon · ATP Wimbledon - 1/8-finals · July 5, 2026 · 12:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI bot is backing F. Auger-Aliassime (moneyline) in F. Auger-Aliassime vs A. Davidovich Fokina (Wimbledon on 2026-07-05).

Surface grass Odds F. Auger-Aliassime 1.50 · A. Davidovich Fokina 2.62

Bot bet

F. Auger-Aliassime (moneyline) · 1.0u
Pending — published before the match, graded in public.
Profiles: F. Auger-Aliassime · A. Davidovich Fokina · head-to-head record · Wimbledon

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method F. Auger-Aliassime A. Davidovich Fokina
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
42.9% 57.1%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
72.8% 27.2%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
58.2% 41.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
42.9% 57.1%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
63.6% 36.4%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
F. Auger-Aliassime hard1996 169–85254
A. Davidovich Fokina hard1851 107–90197

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated April 4, 2026.

Head to head

F. Auger-Aliassime leads 5–1 over 6 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
July 5, 2026WimbledongrassF. Auger-Aliassime3 - 2
Jan. 15, 2025Australian OpenhardA. Davidovich Fokina3 - 2
June 29, 2023 Boodles Challenge (United Kingdom), GrassF. Auger-Aliassime2 - 0
Feb. 23, 2023DohahardF. Auger-Aliassime2 - 0
May 10, 2022RomeclayF. Auger-Aliassime2 - 1

Recent form

F. Auger-Aliassime

L N. Djokovic 2 - 3 July 7, 2026
W A. Davidovich Fokina 3 - 2 July 5, 2026
W M. Zheng 3 - 0 July 3, 2026
W D. Prizmic 3 - 0 July 1, 2026
W A. Shevchenko 3 - 0 June 29, 2026

A. Davidovich Fokina

L A. Molcan 2 - 1 July 16, 2026
W M. Trungelliti 0 - 2 July 15, 2026
L F. Auger-Aliassime 3 - 2 July 5, 2026
W M. Fucsovics 3 - 0 July 3, 2026
W F. Marozsan 3 - 0 July 1, 2026

All July 5, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

═══════════════════════════════════════════════
F. Auger-Aliassime vs A. Davidovich Fokina
Wimbledon · grass · 1/8-finals · 2026-07-05
═══════════════════════════════════════════════

MODELS
  Market:   A 1.50 (63.6%)  |  B 2.62 (36.4%)
  ELO:      A 42.9%  → favors B  (value_pick B, edge +20.7%)
  ML:       A 72.8%  → favors A
  Serve/Rtn:A 58.2%  → favors A
  Ensemble: A 42.9% (defaults to ELO; no mutual agreement)
  → Models SPLIT. ELO dissents toward B; ML + serve/return + market all back A.

FORM — FAA (fresh, dominant)
  07-03  W  Zheng (1750 Strong)   7-6 6-2 6-1  GRIND→cruise
  07-01  W  Prizmic (1476 Weak)   7-6 6-3 7-5  GRIND
  06-29  W  Shevchenko (1346 Weak)6-3 6-1 6-4  DOM
  Wimbledon 3-0, straight sets throughout, quality scalp vs Zheng (Strong).

FORM — ADF (deep run, grinding)
  07-03  W  Fucsovics (1735 Strong)7-6 6-2 6-3  GRIND
  07-01  W  Marozsan (1597 Avg)    6-3 6-0 6-3  DOM
  06-29  W  Cerundolo (1445 Weak)  6-4 6-4 7-6  GRIND
  Pre-SW19: WON Mallorca title (grass) 06-27, beat Dimitrov (1788) en route.

FATIGUE (decisive)
  FAA: 3 matches/14d · 366 court-min · b2b 0 · last 07-03
  ADF: 7 matches/14d · 721 court-min · b2b 3 · 21 sets · last 07-03
  |court-time diff| = 355min (>60) → ADF heavily disadvantaged.
  ADF has played nearly 2x the tennis (title run + 3 SW19 rounds).

NARRATIVE
  Let-down: Mallorca title 8d ago, 3 matches since → not a fresh let-down, WEAK.
  Title recency: ADF's elevated ELO is built ON the grind that now fatigues him.
  Venue: neutral.

VERDICT — BET A (F. Auger-Aliassime) @1.50 · 1.0u
  ELO's B-value (+20.7%) is a FATIGUE TRAP: ADF's rating reflects a punishing
  Mallorca-title-into-Wimbledon run (721 court-min) that leaves him gassed vs a
  fresher, higher-ceiling grass server in dominant form. ML (72.8%), serve/return
  (58.2%) and market all agree on FAA; qualitative read validates them, kills the
  ELO edge. True FAA ~70% vs implied 63.6% → thin but real +EV at a short price.
  Sized 1.0u to respect the skinny 1.50 line.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════