TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in E. Micic vs F. Jorge (Figueira Da Foz (Portugal) - Qualification on 2026-06-16) — the market is efficient, with F. Jorge favoured at 1.16.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Micic | F. Jorge |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
21.5% | 78.5% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
24.0% | 76.0% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
31.4% | 68.6% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
20.8% | 79.2% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
20.5% | 79.5% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.
E. Micic leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 1, 2026 | W50 Elvas (Portugal) | — | E. Micic | 2 - 1 |
| June 16, 2026 | Figueira Da Foz (Portugal) - Qualification | hard | E. Micic | 2 - 0 |
| L | V. Podrez | 0 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| W | G. Garcia-Perez | 2 - 0 | Aug. 2, 2026 |
| L | L. Fruhvirtova | 0 - 2 | July 18, 2026 |
| L | Q. Zheng | 0 - 2 | July 15, 2026 |
| W | M. Matoula | 0 - 2 | July 13, 2026 |
| L | F. Curmi | 2 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| L | C. Y. Lee | 2 - 0 | July 11, 2026 |
| W | A. Voloshchuk | 0 - 2 | July 10, 2026 |
| W | K. Pavlova | 0 - 2 | July 9, 2026 |
| W | H. Abe | 0 - 2 | July 7, 2026 |
All June 16, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used