TENNISEDGE.GG

B. Palicova vs L. Ciric Bagaric — Prediction & Analysis

Makarska · Makarska - 1/16-finals · June 3, 2026 · 10:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in B. Palicova vs L. Ciric Bagaric (Makarska on 2026-06-03) — the market is efficient, with B. Palicova favoured at 1.65.

Surface clay Odds B. Palicova 1.65 · L. Ciric Bagaric 2.08

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: B. Palicova · L. Ciric Bagaric · head-to-head record · Makarska

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method B. Palicova L. Ciric Bagaric
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
42.0% 58.0%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
38.7% 61.3%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
26.8% 73.2%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
35.8% 64.2%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
55.8% 44.2%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
B. Palicova clay1518 95–80175
L. Ciric Bagaric clay1444 98–74172

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 2, 2026.

Head to head

Level at 1–1 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 3, 2026MakarskaclayB. Palicova2 - 0
Aug. 1, 2024ITF W75 Cordenons WomenclayL. Ciric Bagaric1 - 0

Recent form

B. Palicova

W F. Ferro 2 - 1 Aug. 2, 2026
W N. Brancaccio 0 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
W K. Tsygourova 0 - 2 July 31, 2026
W F. Urgesi 2 - 1 July 30, 2026
W F. Parcelli 0 - 2 July 29, 2026

L. Ciric Bagaric

L F. Jones 2 - 0 July 30, 2026
W R. Gailis 2 - 0 July 28, 2026
W M. S. Popa 2 - 0 July 27, 2026
W A. Monnot 0 - 2 July 26, 2026
L A. K. Toth Walk Over July 18, 2026

All June 3, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used