TENNISEDGE.GG

A. Lazaro Garcia vs L. Samson — Prediction & Analysis

Makarska · Makarska - 1/16-finals · June 3, 2026 · 10:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Lazaro Garcia vs L. Samson (Makarska on 2026-06-03) — the market is efficient, with L. Samson favoured at 1.63.

Surface clay Odds A. Lazaro Garcia 2.11 · L. Samson 1.63

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: A. Lazaro Garcia · L. Samson · head-to-head record · Makarska

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method A. Lazaro Garcia L. Samson
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
52.6% 47.4%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
55.5% 44.5%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
46.1% 53.9%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
51.4% 48.6%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
43.6% 56.4%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
A. Lazaro Garcia clay1688 116–82198
L. Samson hard1613 103–62165

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 31, 2026.

Head to head

Level at 1–1 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 3, 2026MakarskaclayA. Lazaro Garcia2 - 0
Sept. 28, 2025W50+H Pazardzhik 2clayL. Samson2 - 0

Recent form

A. Lazaro Garcia

W C. Paquet 1 - 0 Aug. 4, 2026
L L. Pigossi 2 - 0 July 31, 2026
W N. Podoroska 1 - 2 July 30, 2026
W Z. Kulambayeva 0 - 2 July 28, 2026
L A. Korneeva 2 - 1 June 24, 2026

L. Samson

L M. Barthel 0 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
W K. Quevedo 1 - 2 Aug. 2, 2026
W L. Bronzetti 0 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
W M. Ristic 2 - 1 July 31, 2026
W A. Soboleva 0 - 0 July 30, 2026

All June 3, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used