TENNISEDGE.GG

B. Krejcikova vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva — Prediction & Analysis

Parma · Parma - 1/16-finals · May 11, 2026 · 16:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in B. Krejcikova vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva (Parma on 2026-05-11) — the market is efficient, with B. Krejcikova favoured at 1.28.

Surface clay Odds B. Krejcikova 1.28 · V. Jimenez Kasintseva 3.35

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: B. Krejcikova · V. Jimenez Kasintseva · head-to-head record · Parma

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method B. Krejcikova V. Jimenez Kasintseva
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
47.0% 53.0%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
48.1% 51.9%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
47.5% 52.5%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
72.4% 27.6%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
B. Krejcikova hard1893 82–51133
V. Jimenez Kasintseva clay1538 90–67157

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 14, 2026.

Head to head

B. Krejcikova leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 11, 2026ParmaclayB. Krejcikova2 - 0

Recent form

B. Krejcikova

L L. Tagger 2 - 1 July 25, 2026
W D. Salkova 0 - 2 July 24, 2026
W L. Havlickova 0 - 2 July 23, 2026
W L. Fruhvirtova 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
W M. Sakkari 2 - 0 July 19, 2026

V. Jimenez Kasintseva

L A. Parks 0 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
W M. Bassols 2 - 1 Aug. 1, 2026
L T. Korpatsch 1 - 1 July 21, 2026
L A. Charaeva 2 - 0 July 13, 2026
L S. Sorribes Tormo 2 - 0 June 29, 2026

All May 11, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used