TENNISEDGE.GG

V. Sachko vs J. Pinnington Jones — Prediction & Analysis

French Open · ATP French Open - Quarter-finals · May 18, 2026 · 14:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in V. Sachko vs J. Pinnington Jones (French Open on 2026-05-18) — the market is efficient, with J. Pinnington Jones favoured at 1.80.

Surface clay Odds V. Sachko 1.90 · J. Pinnington Jones 1.80

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: V. Sachko · J. Pinnington Jones · head-to-head record · French Open

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method V. Sachko J. Pinnington Jones
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
60.6% 39.4%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
62.4% 37.6%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
33.8% 66.2%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
52.3% 47.7%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
48.6% 51.4%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
V. Sachko clay1629 124–99223
J. Pinnington Jones hard1646 74–50124

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.

Head to head

V. Sachko leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 18, 2026French OpenclayV. Sachko2 - 1

Recent form

V. Sachko

L L. Giustino 2 - 1 Aug. 4, 2026
L J. Rodionov 2 - 0 July 19, 2026
W F. Coria 0 - 2 July 18, 2026
L T. Skatov 2 - 0 July 12, 2026
W M. Dhamne 0 - 2 July 11, 2026

J. Pinnington Jones

L T. Samuel 0 - 2 July 29, 2026
L B. Nakashima 3 - 0 June 30, 2026
L J. Draper 2 - 0 June 24, 2026
W M. Trungelliti 2 - 1 June 22, 2026
L D. Shapovalov 1 - 2 June 15, 2026

All May 18, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used