TENNISEDGE.GG

N. Noha Akugue vs K. Kawa — Prediction & Analysis

Modena (Italy) - Qualification · Modena - 1/8-finals · June 10, 2026 · 12:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in N. Noha Akugue vs K. Kawa (Modena (Italy) - Qualification on 2026-06-10) — the market is efficient, with K. Kawa favoured at 1.80.

Surface clay Odds N. Noha Akugue 1.90 · K. Kawa 1.80

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: N. Noha Akugue · K. Kawa · head-to-head record · Modena (Italy) - Qualification

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method N. Noha Akugue K. Kawa
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
37.7% 62.3%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
22.0% 78.0%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
58.6% 41.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
39.4% 60.6%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
48.6% 51.4%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
N. Noha Akugue clay1601 114–85199
K. Kawa clay1713 106–66172

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 22, 2026.

Head to head

K. Kawa leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 10, 2026Modena (Italy) - QualificationclayK. Kawa2 - 0

Recent form

N. Noha Akugue

W J. Avdeeva 0 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
L A. Bondar 2 - 1 July 22, 2026
W V. Steiner 1 - 2 July 21, 2026
L F. Jones 2 - 0 July 17, 2026
W D. Astakhova 1 - 2 July 15, 2026

K. Kawa

W L. Fruhvirtova 2 - 1 Aug. 3, 2026
L P. Badosa 0 - 2 July 22, 2026
L P. Udvardy 2 - 1 July 16, 2026
W S. Waltert 2 - 0 July 14, 2026
L S. Waltert 2 - 0 July 6, 2026

All June 10, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used