TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in D. Salkova vs M. Trevisan (Modena (Italy) - Qualification on 2026-06-10) — the market is efficient, with D. Salkova favoured at 1.44.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | D. Salkova | M. Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
53.6% | 46.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
58.3% | 41.7% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
42.6% | 57.4% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
51.5% | 48.5% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
64.5% | 35.5% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Salkova | clay | 1614 | 97–70 | 167 |
| M. Trevisan | clay | 1608 | 75–57 | 132 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 1, 2026.
D. Salkova leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 10, 2026 | Modena (Italy) - Qualification | clay | D. Salkova | 2 - 0 |
| L | L. Pigossi | 2 - 0 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| W | A. Rus | 0 - 2 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | A-L. Friedsam | 0 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | L. Boskovic | 1 - 2 | July 29, 2026 |
| L | B. Krejcikova | 0 - 2 | July 24, 2026 |
| L | E. R. Bertea | 0 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | N. Brancaccio | 2 - 1 | July 24, 2026 |
| W | F. Curmi | 0 - 2 | July 23, 2026 |
| W | F. Pace | 0 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | E. R. Bertea | 2 - 0 | July 21, 2026 |
All June 10, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used