TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in K. Feldbausch vs N. Basavareddy (Geneva on 2026-05-17) — the market is efficient, with K. Feldbausch favoured at 1.83.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | K. Feldbausch | N. Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
64.3% | 35.7% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
59.5% | 40.5% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
38.9% | 61.1% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
54.2% | 45.8% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
50.0% | 50.0% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Feldbausch | clay | 1736 | 105–61 | 166 |
| N. Basavareddy | hard | 1750 | 95–49 | 144 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 31, 2026.
N. Basavareddy leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2026 | Geneva | clay | N. Basavareddy | 2 - 0 |
| L | N. Gombos | 2 - 1 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | D. Ajdukovic | 0 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | H. Mayot | 2 - 1 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | I. Buse | 1 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | D. Vallejo | 0 - 2 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | A. Michelsen | 1 - 3 | May 27, 2026 |
| W | T. Fritz | 1 - 3 | May 24, 2026 |
| L | J. Munar | 0 - 2 | May 19, 2026 |
| W | K. Feldbausch | 0 - 2 | May 17, 2026 |
| W | D. E. Galan | 0 - 2 | May 16, 2026 |
All May 17, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used