TENNISEDGE.GG

C. Ruud vs K. Khachanov — Prediction & Analysis

Rome · ATP Rome - Quarter-finals · May 13, 2026 · 15:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in C. Ruud vs K. Khachanov (Rome on 2026-05-13) — the market is efficient, with C. Ruud favoured at 1.20.

Surface clay Odds C. Ruud 1.20 · K. Khachanov 4.50

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: C. Ruud · K. Khachanov · head-to-head record · Rome

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method C. Ruud K. Khachanov
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
72.2% 27.8%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
77.9% 22.1%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
71.4% 28.6%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
73.8% 26.2%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
78.9% 21.1%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
C. Ruud hard1866 119–78197
K. Khachanov hard1781 120–84204

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated April 4, 2026.

Head to head

C. Ruud leads 3–1 over 4 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 13, 2026RomeclayC. Ruud2 - 1
April 3, 2026UTS ChampionshiphardC. Ruud3 - 1
Aug. 2, 2025TorontohardK. Khachanov2 - 0
Sept. 9, 2022US OpenhardC. Ruud3 - 1

Recent form

C. Ruud

L J. M. Cerundolo 2 - 1 July 17, 2026
W J. Faria 1 - 2 July 16, 2026
L H. Hurkacz 0 - 3 June 29, 2026
L B. Shelton 0 - 2 June 25, 2026
L J. Fonseca 1 - 3 May 31, 2026

K. Khachanov

L B. Tomic 2 - 0 July 30, 2026
L F. Cobolli 2 - 3 July 4, 2026
W Y. Hanfmann 3 - 0 July 2, 2026
W B. Harris 3 - 1 June 30, 2026
L M. Damm 0 - 2 June 24, 2026

All May 13, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used