TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Vrancken Peeters vs A. Koevermans (Hertogenbosch on 2026-06-06) — the market is efficient, with A. Koevermans favoured at 1.40.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | A. Vrancken Peeters | A. Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
40.6% | 59.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
54.7% | 45.3% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
47.7% | 52.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
33.7% | 66.3% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Vrancken Peeters | clay | 1481 | 52–49 | 101 |
| A. Koevermans | clay | 1565 | 83–52 | 135 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 9, 2026.
A. Koevermans leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 6, 2026 | Hertogenbosch | grass | A. Koevermans | 2 - 0 |
| Sept. 3, 2022 | W15 Haren | clay | A. Koevermans | 2 - 1 |
| L | K. L. Ebeling | 0 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | S. Van Ernst | 0 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | I. Yamazaki | 2 - 1 | July 29, 2026 |
| L | D. Glushkova | 1 - 2 | July 23, 2026 |
| W | S. Sakellaridi | 2 - 0 | July 22, 2026 |
| L | M. Sawangkaew | 1 - 2 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | H. Vandewinkel | 2 - 0 | June 7, 2026 |
| W | A. Vrancken Peeters | 0 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| L | P. Kudermetova | 2 - 0 | May 19, 2026 |
| L | A. Siskova | 2 - 0 | May 14, 2026 |
All June 6, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used