TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in T. Loof vs J. P. Ficovich (Hertogenbosch on 2026-06-06) — the market is efficient, with J. P. Ficovich favoured at 1.05.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | T. Loof | J. P. Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
50.7% | 49.3% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
56.6% | 43.4% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
53.7% | 46.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
12.4% | 87.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Loof | hard | 1076 | 6–22 | 28 |
| J. P. Ficovich | clay | 1494 | 121–103 | 224 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Nov. 17, 2025.
J. P. Ficovich leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 6, 2026 | Hertogenbosch | grass | J. P. Ficovich | 2 - 1 |
| L | J. P. Ficovich | 1 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| L | I. Marrero Curbelo | 2 - 1 | March 31, 2026 |
| W | S. A. Linde Palacios | 2 - 0 | March 29, 2026 |
| L | M. Vrbensky | 2 - 0 | Nov. 17, 2025 |
| W | S. Nakagawa | 2 - 1 | Nov. 16, 2025 |
| L | M. Alkaya | 2 - 0 | July 20, 2026 |
| L | A. Ouakaa | 2 - 1 | July 14, 2026 |
| L | A. Galarneau | 2 - 1 | July 8, 2026 |
| L | O. Baris | 2 - 1 | July 1, 2026 |
| L | K. Smith | 2 - 0 | June 22, 2026 |
All June 6, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used