TENNISEDGE.GG

A. Rublev vs H. Hurkacz — Prediction & Analysis

Halle · ATP Halle - 1/16-finals · June 16, 2026 · 13:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in A. Rublev vs H. Hurkacz (Halle on 2026-06-16) — the market is efficient, with H. Hurkacz favoured at 1.80.

Surface grass Odds A. Rublev 2.00 · H. Hurkacz 1.80

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: A. Rublev · H. Hurkacz · head-to-head record · Halle

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method A. Rublev H. Hurkacz
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
53.2% 46.8%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
41.9% 58.1%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
50.6% 49.4%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
47.4% 52.6%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
A. Rublev hard1854 163–90253
H. Hurkacz hard1777 125–81206

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated April 4, 2026.

Head to head

H. Hurkacz leads 3–2 over 5 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 16, 2026HallegrassH. Hurkacz2 - 0
Feb. 7, 2025RotterdamhardH. Hurkacz2 - 1
Oct. 15, 2023ATP ShanghaihardH. Hurkacz2 - 1
March 17, 2022Indian WellshardA. Rublev2 - 0
Feb. 25, 2022DubaihardA. Rublev2 - 1

Recent form

A. Rublev

L L. van Assche 1 - 2 July 24, 2026
W T. Skatov 2 - 0 July 23, 2026
W L. Darderi 2 - 0 July 19, 2026
W A. Tabilo 2 - 1 July 18, 2026
W S. Baez 2 - 0 July 17, 2026

H. Hurkacz

L J-L. Struff 2 - 2 July 5, 2026
W T. Paul 3 - 1 July 3, 2026
W S. Ofner 3 - 0 July 1, 2026
W C. Ruud 0 - 3 June 29, 2026
L J. Mensik 2 - 1 June 25, 2026

All June 16, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used