TennisEdge's AI bot is backing V. Erjavec (moneyline) at 1.80 in V. Erjavec vs J. Grabher (Kitzbuhel (Austria) - Qualification on 2026-07-18). Result: LOST.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | V. Erjavec | J. Grabher |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
52.6% | 47.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
62.5% | 37.5% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
65.3% | 34.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
57.8% | 42.2% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
51.4% | 48.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. Erjavec | clay | 1649 | 143–86 | 229 |
| J. Grabher | clay | 1658 | 161–96 | 257 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Sept. 14, 2026.
J. Grabher leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Philadelphia (Usa) | hard | J. Grabher | 2 - 1 |
| July 18, 2026 | Kitzbuhel (Austria) - Qualification | clay | J. Grabher | 2 - 0 |
| L | F. Curmi | 2 - 1 | Sept. 14, 2026 |
| L | J. Paolini | 2 - 1 | Aug. 30, 2026 |
| L | J. Grabher | 1 - 2 | Aug. 24, 2026 |
| L | M. Stoiana | 2 - 0 | Aug. 11, 2026 |
| L | L. Romero Gormaz | 2 - 0 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | S. Cirstea | 0 - 2 | Aug. 31, 2026 |
| L | T. Valentova | 2 - 0 | Aug. 28, 2026 |
| W | F. Crawley | 0 - 2 | Aug. 27, 2026 |
| W | A. Krueger | 2 - 0 | Aug. 25, 2026 |
| W | V. Erjavec | 1 - 2 | Aug. 24, 2026 |
All July 18, 2026 results & picks →