TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Sawangkaew vs L. Miyazaki (Birmingham on 2026-05-30) — the market is efficient, with M. Sawangkaew favoured at 1.28.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | M. Sawangkaew | L. Miyazaki |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
54.2% | 45.8% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
58.4% | 41.6% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
56.3% | 43.7% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
72.3% | 27.7% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Sawangkaew | hard | 1718 | 145–79 | 224 |
| L. Miyazaki | hard | 1504 | 143–96 | 239 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 1, 2026.
M. Sawangkaew leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | Birmingham | grass | M. Sawangkaew | 2 - 0 |
| L | R. Sramkova | 0 - 2 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | T. Preston | 2 - 1 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | E. Jones | 0 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | N. Hibino | 1 - 2 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | E. S. Liang | 0 - 2 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | E. Yaneva | 0 - 2 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | T. Maria | 2 - 1 | June 7, 2026 |
| L | M. Sawangkaew | 2 - 0 | May 30, 2026 |
| L | S. Saito | 1 - 2 | May 19, 2026 |
| L | Mushika Mio | 1 - 2 | May 14, 2026 |
All May 30, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used