TENNISEDGE.GG

M. Landaluce vs J. C. Prado Angelo — Prediction & Analysis

French Open · ATP French Open - 1/64-finals · May 25, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Landaluce vs J. C. Prado Angelo (French Open on 2026-05-25) — the market is efficient, with M. Landaluce favoured at 1.36.

Surface clay Odds M. Landaluce 1.36 · J. C. Prado Angelo 3.20

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: M. Landaluce · J. C. Prado Angelo · head-to-head record · French Open

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method M. Landaluce J. C. Prado Angelo
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
39.2% 60.8%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
52.0% 48.0%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
44.2% 55.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
45.2% 54.8%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
70.2% 29.8%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
M. Landaluce hard1731 73–47120
J. C. Prado Angelo clay1637 136–89225

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.

Head to head

M. Landaluce leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 26, 2026French OpenclayM. Landaluce3 - 2

Recent form

M. Landaluce

L N. Mejia 2 - 1 Aug. 3, 2026
L M. Zheng 2 - 0 July 29, 2026
L S. Kwon 3 - 0 June 29, 2026
L J-L. Struff 2 - 1 June 22, 2026
L T. Atmane 2 - 1 June 15, 2026

J. C. Prado Angelo

L F. Diaz Acosta 2 - 1 July 31, 2026
W D. Rincon 1 - 2 July 27, 2026
L T. Daniel 2 - 0 July 18, 2026
L D. Dzumhur 0 - 2 July 15, 2026
W L. Neumayer 0 - 2 July 14, 2026

All May 25, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used