TENNISEDGE.GG

K. Khachanov vs J. De Jong — Prediction & Analysis

French Open · ATP French Open - 1/16-finals · May 29, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in K. Khachanov vs J. De Jong (French Open on 2026-05-29) — the market is efficient, with K. Khachanov favoured at 1.40.

Surface clay Odds K. Khachanov 1.40 · J. De Jong 3.00

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: K. Khachanov · J. De Jong · head-to-head record · French Open

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method K. Khachanov J. De Jong
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
62.9% 37.1%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
77.7% 22.3%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
45.5% 54.5%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
62.0% 38.0%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
68.2% 31.8%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
K. Khachanov hard1781 120–84204
J. De Jong clay1752 139–88227

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 30, 2026.

Head to head

Level at 1–1 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
May 29, 2026French OpenclayJ. De Jong3 - 2
Feb. 11, 2026RotterdamhardK. Khachanov2 - 1

Recent form

K. Khachanov

L B. Tomic 2 - 0 July 30, 2026
L F. Cobolli 2 - 3 July 4, 2026
W Y. Hanfmann 3 - 0 July 2, 2026
W B. Harris 3 - 1 June 30, 2026
L M. Damm 0 - 2 June 24, 2026

J. De Jong

L T. Skatov 2 - 1 July 21, 2026
L S. Baez 0 - 2 July 16, 2026
W V. Gaubas 2 - 0 July 13, 2026
L J. Fonseca 0 - 3 July 1, 2026
W R. Hijikata 3 - 2 June 30, 2026

All May 29, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used