TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. McCabe vs Z. Bergs (Hertogenbosch on 2026-06-10) — the market is efficient, with Z. Bergs favoured at 1.44.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | J. McCabe | Z. Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
58.0% | 42.0% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
51.2% | 48.8% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
88.2% | 11.8% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
65.8% | 34.2% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
34.4% | 65.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 25, 2026.
J. McCabe leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 10, 2026 | Hertogenbosch | grass | J. McCabe | 2 - 1 |
| L | A. Bolt | 0 - 2 | July 25, 2026 |
| L | D. Chan | 1 - 2 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | B. Tomic | 0 - 2 | July 16, 2026 |
| W | M. Imamura | 0 - 2 | July 15, 2026 |
| L | J. Jung | 0 - 2 | July 8, 2026 |
| L | T. Fritz | 2 - 0 | July 27, 2026 |
| L | A. Fery | 2 - 3 | July 4, 2026 |
| W | J. Faria | 3 - 1 | July 2, 2026 |
| W | U. Humbert | 2 - 3 | June 30, 2026 |
| W | U. Humbert | 2 - 1 | June 28, 2026 |
All June 10, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used