TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in E. Nava vs T. Seyboth Wild (French Open on 2026-05-20) — the market is efficient, with E. Nava favoured at 1.53.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Nava | T. Seyboth Wild |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
68.4% | 31.6% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
76.1% | 23.9% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
45.3% | 54.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
63.2% | 36.8% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
60.9% | 39.1% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Nava | hard | 1646 | 114–94 | 208 |
| T. Seyboth Wild | clay | 1664 | 141–102 | 243 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 19, 2026.
E. Nava leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | French Open | clay | E. Nava | 2 - 0 |
| L | I. Buse | 1 - 3 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | H. Stewart | 1 - 2 | June 20, 2026 |
| L | T. Daniel | 2 - 0 | June 11, 2026 |
| W | P. Boscardin Dias | 1 - 2 | June 9, 2026 |
| W | H. Squire | 0 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| L | J. Kumstat | 2 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | A. Martin | 0 - 2 | July 28, 2026 |
| W | M. Huesler | 0 - 2 | July 26, 2026 |
| W | D. Dietrich | 2 - 0 | July 25, 2026 |
| W | P. Henning | 0 - 2 | July 24, 2026 |
All May 20, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used