TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in E. Nava vs H. Stewart (Eastbourne on 2026-06-20) — the market is efficient, with E. Nava favoured at 1.40.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Nava | H. Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
36.8% | 63.2% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
53.0% | 47.0% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
51.8% | 48.2% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
66.3% | 33.7% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Nava | hard | 1646 | 114–94 | 208 |
| H. Stewart | hard | 1535 | 126–78 | 204 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 19, 2026.
H. Stewart leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 20, 2026 | Eastbourne | grass | H. Stewart | 2 - 1 |
| L | I. Buse | 1 - 3 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | H. Stewart | 1 - 2 | June 20, 2026 |
| L | T. Daniel | 2 - 0 | June 11, 2026 |
| W | P. Boscardin Dias | 1 - 2 | June 9, 2026 |
| W | H. Squire | 0 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| L | P. Inchauspe | 2 - 1 | July 13, 2026 |
| L | I. Radulov | 1 - 2 | July 8, 2026 |
| W | P. Aunion | 2 - 0 | July 6, 2026 |
| L | T. A. Tirante | 2 - 0 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | A. Vukic | 1 - 2 | June 21, 2026 |
All June 20, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used