TENNISEDGE.GG

W. Ewald vs J. Mikulskyte — Prediction & Analysis

Warsaw · · Aug. 3, 2026 · 08:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in W. Ewald vs J. Mikulskyte (Warsaw on 2026-08-03) — the market is efficient, with J. Mikulskyte favoured at 1.53.

Surface hard Odds W. Ewald 2.50 · J. Mikulskyte 1.53

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: W. Ewald · J. Mikulskyte · head-to-head record · Warsaw

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method W. Ewald J. Mikulskyte
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
47.4% 52.6%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
59.7% 40.3%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
58.2% 41.8%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
50.2% 49.8%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
38.0% 62.0%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
W. Ewald hard1450 59–4099
J. Mikulskyte hard1499 123–96219

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.

Head to head

J. Mikulskyte leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
Aug. 4, 2026WarsawhardJ. Mikulskyte2 - 0

Recent form

W. Ewald

L J. Mikulskyte 0 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L C. Noel 1 - 2 July 30, 2026
W S. Yardley 0 - 2 July 29, 2026
L G. Feistel 0 - 2 June 27, 2026
W B. Palicova 2 - 1 June 26, 2026

J. Mikulskyte

W W. Ewald 0 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L G. T. Di 2 - 1 July 28, 2026
L A. Herrero Linana 2 - 0 July 22, 2026
W M. Bayerlova 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
L M. Kubka 2 - 1 July 19, 2026

All Aug. 3, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

═══ W. Ewald (A) vs J. Mikulskyte (B) — Warsaw, HARD ═══

MODELS vs MARKET
  ELO A 47.4% | ML A 59.7% | Blend A 50.2% | Market-implied A 38.0% (odds 2.5 / 1.53)
  Value pick A, book edge +12.3% (blend) / +9.5% (ELO). Models disagree with market
  and with EACH OTHER: ML (60%) is a strong outlier, ELO conservative at 47%, blend a
  coin-flip. No exchange price (betfair_ml null) — edge is book-only.

RECENT FORM (last 5)
  Ewald (20, #393) — clay specialist:
   07-30 W50 Dublin L C.Noel(1500) 6-1 3-6 4-6 (lost in 3)
   07-29 W50 Dublin W S.Yardley(1500) 6-3 6-2 DOM
   06-27 W50 Gdansk(clay) L Feistel(1545) SF 1-6 6-7
   06-26 W50 Gdansk(clay) W Palicova(1493) QF GRIND (0-6 7-6 6-4)
   06-25 W50 Gdansk(clay) W Paszun(1221)
   Shape: STABLE/FADING — lost last, run built on clay. Only recent hard result
   (W50 Lopota 05-04) was a loss. Surface TRANSITION clay→hard on the backed side.
  Mikulskyte (30, #250):
   07-28 W50 Knokke L Di(1500) in 3
   07-22 W100 Amstetten L Herrero 6-3 6-0 (blown out)
   07-21 W100 Amstetten W Bayerlova 7-5 6-3
   07-19 W75 Vitoria L Kubka in 3
   07-18 W75 Vitoria W Savinykh
   Shape: FADING at W75/W100 level, but higher level of play. Won W35 Tumkur HARD
   title 05-10 (weak field elo 1000-1460 — farmed). Some hard pedigree Ewald lacks.

FATIGUE (Step 2)
  Snapshot showed B heavy load (443min/14d) but last match 07-28 = 5d rest now;
  A last 07-30 = 3d rest. Neither in an extreme spot. Cumulative load = context only,
  no edge. Not used.

NARRATIVE
  Surface TRANSITION: Ewald's recent run is clay; Warsaw is hard, her hard sample is
  thin and negative — a transition on the BACKED side = risk, depresses level. No
  let-down/title-recency signal live enough to matter.

ELO/RANKING SANITY
  ML rates Ewald 60% yet she is ranked #393 vs #250 — high-model/modest-rank, suspect
  the ML input for this clay player on hard. ELO (47%) is the credible read; discount ML.

GATES
  G1 edge-origin: PASS — numeric book edge (+9.5% ELO / +12.3% blend) exists pre-narrative.
  G2 consensus:   stake-tier — split models (ELO 47 vs ML 60), lone-credible-model → capped tier.
  G3 fatal-risk:  n/a (ML market).

VERDICT: PASS. The 12% "value" is BOOK-ONLY (no Betfair liquidity — Pricing Discipline
#4, the segment the backtest loses on). The edge is driven by an outlier ML model while
the credible ELO is only mildly above market; the qualitative read actively CONTRADICTS
the backed side — Ewald is a clay specialist transitioning to hard with a weak hard
record, lower-ranked than an opponent who holds recent hard-court pedigree. Model-market
disagreement is not independently validated; no exchange price to execute at a fair line.
No bet.

MARKET CHOICE
  alt_markets: none at analysis time
  AH: not quoted