TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in S. Sorribes Tormo vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva (Wimbledon on 2026-06-29) — the market is efficient, with S. Sorribes Tormo favoured at 1.72.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | S. Sorribes Tormo | V. Jimenez Kasintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
40.3% | 59.7% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
49.5% | 50.6% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
44.9% | 55.1% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
55.0% | 45.0% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Sorribes Tormo | hard | 1519 | 62–59 | 121 |
| V. Jimenez Kasintseva | clay | 1538 | 90–67 | 157 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Feb. 17, 2026.
S. Sorribes Tormo leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 29, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | S. Sorribes Tormo | 2 - 0 |
| June 2, 2026 | Makarska | clay | S. Sorribes Tormo | 2 - 0 |
| L | L. Bronzetti | 1 - 2 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | C. W. Hennemann | 2 - 0 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | L. Romero Gormaz | 1 - 2 | July 27, 2026 |
| L | A. Charaeva | 1 - 2 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | A. Bondar | 2 - 0 | July 13, 2026 |
| L | A. Parks | 0 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| W | M. Bassols | 2 - 1 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | T. Korpatsch | 1 - 1 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | A. Charaeva | 2 - 0 | July 13, 2026 |
| L | S. Sorribes Tormo | 2 - 0 | June 29, 2026 |
All June 29, 2026 results & picks →
═══ S. Sorribes Tormo vs V. Jimenez Kasintseva | Wimbledon GRASS | R1 (1/64) ═══
MODELS
ELO: 40% Sorribes / 60% Jimenez (strongly favors Jimenez)
ML: 49% / 51% (essentially a coin flip)
Ensemble: 45% / 55% (model winner = Jimenez)
Market: 55% Sorribes / 45% Jimenez (devigged)
Odds: 1.72 Sorribes / 2.10 Jimenez
Value: JIMENEZ edge +10.1% (confidence: LOW)
ALIGNMENT CHECK
ELO agrees with market? NO ML agrees with market? NO
-> BOTH models disagree with market = investigate qualitatively
RECENT FORM (last 90d — ALL CLAY, zero grass for either)
Sorribes: 11-4 | beats Avg (1500-1650), loses only to Strong (1690-1730)
06-02 W vs Jimenez Kasintseva 2-0 <- H2H, 27d ago, straight sets
Jimenez: 4-8 | beats Weak/Avg, loses to sub-1600 incl. a 1310
04-11 L vs Zvonareva [1310] 0-2 <- red flag
FATIGUE
Sorribes: 0 matches/14d | last 06-06 -> 23d rest
Jimenez: 0 matches/14d | last 06-13 -> 16d rest
EDGE: Roughly equal. BOTH cold — long layoff, no grass warm-up.
NARRATIVE SIGNALS
LETDOWN: none VENUE: neither has Wimbledon history
H2H: Sorribes beat Jimenez 2-0 just 27 days ago (clay)
QUALITATIVE VERDICT
Jimenez's +10% value is built ENTIRELY on stale grass-surface ELO (zero grass
matches in 90d). Every live signal cuts the other way: Sorribes 11-4 vs 4-8,
Jimenez lost to a 1310, and Sorribes won the H2H in straight sets <1 month ago.
Per 'live form > historical surface ELO,' the edge is a rating artifact. But the
market already prices Sorribes fairly (55% mkt vs 45% model) — no value on her
either. Grass + double cold layoff = high variance neither model captures.
DECISION
PASS (lean Sorribes on merits, but no price)
Reason: Jimenez's edge is a stale-grass-ELO mirage refuted by recent H2H and
live form; Sorribes is the right side but offers no value at 1.72.