TENNISEDGE.GG

R. Safiullin vs J. McCabe — Prediction & Analysis

Wimbledon · ATP Wimbledon - Quarter-finals · June 22, 2026 · 12:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in R. Safiullin vs J. McCabe (Wimbledon on 2026-06-22) — the market is efficient, with R. Safiullin favoured at 1.44.

Surface grass Odds R. Safiullin 1.44 · J. McCabe 2.62

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: R. Safiullin · J. McCabe · head-to-head record · Wimbledon

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method R. Safiullin J. McCabe
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
43.8% 56.2%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
70.5% 29.5%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
23.4% 76.6%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
43.8% 56.2%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
64.5% 35.5%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
R. Safiullin hard1715 107–81188
J. McCabe hard1553 154–113267

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 4, 2026.

Head to head

R. Safiullin leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 22, 2026WimbledongrassR. Safiullin2 - 0
June 25, 2023ATP MallorcagrassR. Safiullin2 - 1

Recent form

R. Safiullin

L N. Djokovic 1 - 3 July 5, 2026
W J. Fonseca 3 - 0 July 3, 2026
W B. Van De Zandschulp 3 - 2 July 1, 2026
W A. Rublev 2 - 3 June 29, 2026
W J. Kym 3 - 2 June 25, 2026

J. McCabe

L A. Bolt 0 - 2 July 25, 2026
L D. Chan 1 - 2 July 21, 2026
L B. Tomic 0 - 2 July 16, 2026
W M. Imamura 0 - 2 July 15, 2026
L J. Jung 0 - 2 July 8, 2026

All June 22, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used