TENNISEDGE.GG

N. Borges vs E. Quinn — Prediction & Analysis

Mallorca · ATP Mallorca - Semi-finals · June 26, 2026 · 15:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in N. Borges vs E. Quinn (Mallorca on 2026-06-26) — the market is efficient, with N. Borges favoured at 1.78.

Surface grass Odds N. Borges 1.78 · E. Quinn 1.98

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: N. Borges · E. Quinn · head-to-head record · Mallorca

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method N. Borges E. Quinn
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
47.8% 52.2%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
57.3% 42.7%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
51.0% 49.0%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
52.0% 48.0%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
52.7% 47.3%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
N. Borges hard1773 128–74202
E. Quinn hard1803 112–77189

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.

Head to head

E. Quinn leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 26, 2026MallorcagrassE. Quinn2 - 0

Recent form

N. Borges

W A. Kovacevic 1 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
L R. A. Burruchaga 1 - 2 July 22, 2026
W O. Luz 2 - 0 July 21, 2026
L L. Darderi 0 - 2 July 17, 2026
W G. Dimitrov 2 - 0 July 15, 2026

E. Quinn

L S. Mochizuki 3 - 0 July 1, 2026
W L. Darderi 3 - 0 June 29, 2026
L A. Davidovich Fokina 0 - 2 June 27, 2026
W N. Borges 0 - 2 June 26, 2026
W V. Kopriva 2 - 1 June 25, 2026

All June 26, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

The mathematical consensus shows a microscopic 0.2% edge for N. Borges, resulting in a 0.0 Kelly stake suggestion. While the ML model favors Borges (57.3%), the ELO model strongly disagrees by favoring Quinn (52.2%), signaling high uncertainty. Qualitative factors align slightly with the ML pick, noting Borges has been more efficient (3-0 without dropping a set) and carries less fatigue than Quinn. With zero betting value and conflicting models, the prudent action is to pass.