TENNISEDGE.GG

M. Trungelliti vs N. Mejia — Prediction & Analysis

Montreal · ATP Montreal - Final · Aug. 1, 2026 · 14:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Trungelliti vs N. Mejia (Montreal on 2026-08-01) — the market is efficient, with M. Trungelliti favoured at 1.40.

Surface hard Odds M. Trungelliti 1.40 · N. Mejia 2.75

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: M. Trungelliti · N. Mejia · head-to-head record · Montreal

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method M. Trungelliti N. Mejia
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
43.6% 56.4%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
50.5% 49.5%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
27.9% 72.1%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
48.2% 51.8%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
66.3% 33.7%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
M. Trungelliti clay1739 160–87247
N. Mejia hard1591 88–100188

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 22, 2026.

Head to head

N. Mejia leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
Aug. 1, 2026MontrealhardN. Mejia2 - 1

Recent form

M. Trungelliti

L N. Mejia 1 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
L Y. Hanfmann 0 - 2 July 22, 2026
W J. M. Cerundolo 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
L A. Davidovich Fokina 0 - 2 July 15, 2026
W K. Jacquet 0 - 2 July 13, 2026

N. Mejia

W M. Landaluce 2 - 1 Aug. 3, 2026
W M. Trungelliti 1 - 2 Aug. 1, 2026
L A. Hernandez 0 - 2 July 26, 2026
W M. Soto 2 - 0 July 12, 2026
W J. P. Varillas 2 - 1 July 11, 2026

All Aug. 1, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

═══ Trungelliti vs Mejia — Montreal (hard), Final ═══

MODELS vs MARKET
  Market: Trungelliti @1.40 (66.3%) / Mejia @2.75 (36.4%)
  ELO A 0.436 | ML A 0.505 | blended A 0.482
  All three models put Trungelliti at/below coinflip → they favor Mejia vs a
  market that has Trungelliti a strong 66% favourite. value_pick B, edge ~15-18%.
  betfair_ml: null — NO exchange liquidity on this event.

RECENT FORM (last 5)
  Trungelliti (A, 36, rank 78): all recent play CLAY/GRASS — Kitzbuhel (clay,
   last match 07-22, ~10d ago), Umag (clay), Wimbledon (grass), Eastbourne (grass).
   Montreal is HARD → TRANSITION + rust (>7d idle). No recent hard-court results.
  Mejia (B, 26, rank 168): Los Cabos SF (hard) 07-26 LOST 5-7 2-6 to a 1377-elo
   opponent — poor hard-court shape; before that won Bogota (CLAY Challenger) title
   vs 1322-1581 fields. His rating is built on clay/weak fields, not hard.

FATIGUE
  A: last match 07-22, matches_7d 0 — rested, no extreme spot (rust, not fatigue).
  B: last match 07-26, 1 match/7d — rested. No 3-set hangover on either side.
  Neither side qualifies for a fatigue edge.

ELO/RANKING SANITY (decisive)
  Trungelliti: rank 78 yet ELO makes him a dog to rank-168 Mejia → "strong rank,
   low ELO" (off-surface, layoff) → ELO UNDERSTATES him; do NOT back opponent on gap.
  Mejia: rank 168 yet high ELO → "high ELO, modest rank" → farmed at a weak clay
   Challenger; discount unless live form backs it — and his last hard match was a
   bad loss to a 1377 player, so live form does NOT back the ELO edge.
  Both checks push the model-B edge toward discount/PASS.

GATES
  G1 edge-origin: FAIL — the numeric model-vs-market edge on B is driven by farmed
    ELO (weak-field clay Challenger) that the ELO/ranking sanity + live hard-court
    form both invalidate; no trustworthy pre-narrative edge survives.
  G2 consensus:   stake-tier only — would be lone/contaminated (farmed ELO, off-surface).
  G3 fatal-risk:  n/a (ml candidate).

PRICING
  No betfair_ml — illiquid small event = the segment the backtest loses on
  (Pricing Discipline #4 → prefer PASS). Book B edge exists nominally (~15% vs 2.75)
  but rests on a discountable rating, not confirmable value.

VERDICT: PASS. Large model-market gap, but the B edge is manufactured by farmed/
  understated ELO ratings on an off-surface transition spot with no exchange price
  to confirm. Market favoring the higher-ranked, if rusty, Trungelliti is defensible;
  no trustworthy edge to stake.