TENNISEDGE.GG

M. Sherif vs L. Jeanjean — Prediction & Analysis

Contrexeville · Contrexeville - Semi-finals · July 11, 2026 · 16:30 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Sherif vs L. Jeanjean (Contrexeville on 2026-07-11) — the market is efficient, with M. Sherif favoured at 1.53.

Surface clay Odds M. Sherif 1.53 · L. Jeanjean 2.37

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: M. Sherif · L. Jeanjean · head-to-head record · Contrexeville

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method M. Sherif L. Jeanjean
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
55.6% 44.4%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
21.4% 78.6%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
38.6% 61.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
44.6% 55.4%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
60.8% 39.2%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
M. Sherif clay1837 179–72251
L. Jeanjean clay1691 111–70181

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 25, 2026.

Head to head

Level at 1–1 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
July 11, 2026ContrexevilleclayM. Sherif2 - 0
Nov. 22, 2025ColinaclayL. Jeanjean2 - 1

Recent form

M. Sherif

L T. Korpatsch 0 - 1 July 25, 2026
W P. Badosa 2 - 1 July 24, 2026
W E. Jacquemot 2 - 0 July 23, 2026
W S. Waltert 1 - 2 July 22, 2026
W P. Badosa 1 - 0 July 20, 2026

L. Jeanjean

L M. Frech 2 - 0 Aug. 3, 2026
W L. Zhu 2 - 1 Aug. 1, 2026
L M. Sherif 2 - 0 July 11, 2026
W A. Tubello 2 - 1 July 10, 2026
W F. Jones 1 - 2 July 9, 2026

All July 11, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used