TENNISEDGE.GG

M. Bayerlova vs D. Martynov — Prediction & Analysis

Contrexeville · Contrexeville - Semi-finals · July 5, 2026 · 14:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in M. Bayerlova vs D. Martynov (Contrexeville on 2026-07-05) — the market is efficient, with D. Martynov favoured at 1.33.

Surface clay Odds M. Bayerlova 3.25 · D. Martynov 1.33

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: M. Bayerlova · D. Martynov · head-to-head record · Contrexeville

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method M. Bayerlova D. Martynov
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
40.1% 59.9%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
32.6% 67.4%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
55.6% 44.4%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
38.7% 61.3%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
29.0% 71.0%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
M. Bayerlova clay1275 84–77161
D. Martynov hard1382 43–5295

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 5, 2026.

Head to head

D. Martynov leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
July 5, 2026ContrexevilleclayD. Martynov2 - 0

Recent form

M. Bayerlova

L J. Mikulskyte 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
L D. Martynov 0 - 2 July 5, 2026
L A. Zolotareva 2 - 0 June 6, 2026
W E. Milovanovic 1 - 2 June 5, 2026
W E. Ilic 0 - 2 June 4, 2026

D. Martynov

L F. Urgesi 1 - 2 July 29, 2026
L E. Pridankina 2 - 0 July 19, 2026
L X. Yao 0 - 2 July 16, 2026
W F. Parcelli 2 - 1 July 14, 2026
L J. Vandromme 2 - 0 July 7, 2026

All July 5, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used