TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in L. Siegemund vs A. Anisimova (London on 2026-06-10) — the market is efficient, with A. Anisimova favoured at 1.33.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | L. Siegemund | A. Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
24.4% | 75.6% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
12.1% | 87.9% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
64.1% | 35.9% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
33.5% | 66.5% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
28.1% | 71.9% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Siegemund | hard | 1715 | 70–62 | 132 |
| A. Anisimova | hard | 1994 | 90–46 | 136 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 19, 2026.
A. Anisimova leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 10, 2026 | London | grass | A. Anisimova | 2 - 0 |
| L | E. Mertens | 2 - 0 | June 30, 2026 |
| L | S. Bejlek | 2 - 1 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | A. Anisimova | 0 - 2 | June 10, 2026 |
| W | F. Jones | 2 - 0 | June 9, 2026 |
| L | N. Osaka | 0 - 2 | May 26, 2026 |
| L | M. Keys | 1 - 2 | July 4, 2026 |
| W | S. Kenin | 2 - 1 | July 2, 2026 |
| W | L. Gjorcheska | 2 - 0 | June 30, 2026 |
| L | I. Jovic | 2 - 1 | June 12, 2026 |
| W | L. Siegemund | 0 - 2 | June 10, 2026 |
All June 10, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used