TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in L. Samsonova vs M. Bouzkova (Wimbledon on 2026-07-03) — the market is efficient, with M. Bouzkova favoured at 1.66.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | L. Samsonova | M. Bouzkova |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
49.0% | 51.0% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
40.4% | 59.6% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
42.5% | 57.5% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
49.0% | 51.0% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
41.0% | 59.0% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Samsonova | hard | 1750 | 30–32 | 62 |
| M. Bouzkova | hard | 1747 | 128–86 | 214 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.
L. Samsonova leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 4, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | M. Bouzkova | 2 - 1 |
| Jan. 7, 2025 | Adelaide | hard | L. Samsonova | 2 - 1 |
| Aug. 29, 2024 | WTA US Open | hard | L. Samsonova | 2 - 1 |
| W | J. Tjen | 0 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| L | D. Shnaider | 2 - 0 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | Xin. Wang | 0 - 2 | July 29, 2026 |
| W | M. Keys | 2 - 1 | July 27, 2026 |
| L | M. Bouzkova | 1 - 2 | July 4, 2026 |
| L | T. Valentova | 1 - 2 | July 24, 2026 |
| W | C. Y. Lee | 2 - 0 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | J. Bouzas Maneiro | 2 - 0 | July 20, 2026 |
| L | E. Mertens | 0 - 2 | July 6, 2026 |
| W | L. Samsonova | 1 - 2 | July 4, 2026 |
All July 3, 2026 results & picks →
═══════════════════════════════════════════
L. Samsonova (A) vs M. Bouzkova (B)
Wimbledon · grass · 2026-07-04
═══════════════════════════════════════════
MODELS
ELO A 0.49 | B 0.51
ML A 0.40 | B 0.60
S/R A 0.42 | B 0.58
Model A 0.49 | B 0.51
Market A 0.41 (2.39) | B 0.59 (1.66) → value_pick A, edge +0.08 (ELO-only)
FORM
Samsonova (A): grass building at Wimbledon — d. Kudermetova 6-3 6-3 (DOM, Avg),
d. Shnaider 4-6 6-4 2-6 (GRIND, Avg). Earlier d. Siniakova (Strong 1774).
But grass Ls to Svitolina, Mertens, Dart. Mixed.
Bouzkova (B): RED-HOT grass. Nottingham CHAMPION 12d ago — d. Navarro (1827),
Pliskova (1749 DOM), Maria (1783). Then 2-0 Wimbledon incl. Grant (Strong 1801).
Live grass form clearly dominant.
FATIGUE
A: 4 matches/14d, ~298min court, b2b 0, rested edge.
B: 6 matches/14d, ~420min court, b2b 3. Court-time diff 122min → B heavier.
Slight fatigue edge to Samsonova, but Bouzkova proven durable through the run.
NARRATIVE
Let-down (B): Nottingham Final won 12d ago → beyond window, None (has won since).
Title recency (B): TITLE Nottingham 12d ago (grass) — live grass surge.
Venue: neutral (first Wimbledon meeting).
VERDICT — PASS
The only "edge" is ELO giving A 0.49 vs market 0.41. ML (0.40), serve/return (0.42)
and market all converge on Bouzkova ~59%. The lone ELO dissent is historical lag,
and the qualitative read (Bouzkova's grass surge + Nottingham title) CONTRADICTS
rather than validates the A edge — live form > historical ELO. Samsonova's fatigue
advantage is real but insufficient against a grass-specialist in dominant form.
B is efficiently priced (model+market aligned) → no value either side. No bet.
═══════════════════════════════════════════