TENNISEDGE.GG

K. Rinaldo Persson vs N. Noha Akugue — Prediction & Analysis

Makarska · Makarska - 1/8-finals · June 4, 2026 · 10:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in K. Rinaldo Persson vs N. Noha Akugue (Makarska on 2026-06-04) — the market is efficient, with N. Noha Akugue favoured at 1.72.

Surface clay Odds K. Rinaldo Persson 2.05 · N. Noha Akugue 1.72

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: K. Rinaldo Persson · N. Noha Akugue · head-to-head record · Makarska

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method K. Rinaldo Persson N. Noha Akugue
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
50.9% 49.1%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
61.9% 38.1%
Serve / return
point-by-point simulation
50.4% 49.6%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
54.4% 45.6%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
45.6% 54.4%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
K. Rinaldo Persson clay1574 111–69180
N. Noha Akugue clay1601 114–85199

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 30, 2026.

Head to head

N. Noha Akugue leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 4, 2026MakarskaclayN. Noha Akugue2 - 0

Recent form

K. Rinaldo Persson

L E. Bennemann 1 - 1 July 30, 2026
W I. Wobker 0 - 2 July 29, 2026
L B. Zeltina 2 - 1 July 22, 2026
W M. Lombardini 0 - 2 July 21, 2026
L D. Astakhova 0 - 2 July 13, 2026

N. Noha Akugue

W J. Avdeeva 0 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
L A. Bondar 2 - 1 July 22, 2026
W V. Steiner 1 - 2 July 21, 2026
L F. Jones 2 - 0 July 17, 2026
W D. Astakhova 1 - 2 July 15, 2026

All June 4, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used