TENNISEDGE.GG

J. Tjen vs C. McNally — Prediction & Analysis

Eastbourne · WTA Eastbourne - 1/16-finals · June 22, 2026 · 11:00 UTC

TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. Tjen vs C. McNally (Eastbourne on 2026-06-22) — the market is efficient, with C. McNally favoured at 1.48.

Surface grass Odds J. Tjen 2.64 · C. McNally 1.48

Verdict: no bet

The model found no value at current prices — the market has this one priced about right. That verdict is part of the public record too.
Profiles: J. Tjen · C. McNally · head-to-head record · Eastbourne

Model probabilities

Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.

Method J. Tjen C. McNally
Elo
ratings-based, surface-weighted
19.4% 80.7%
Machine learning
29-feature gradient-boosted model
46.5% 53.5%
Blend
what the bot actually prices off
32.9% 67.1%
Market implied
de-vigged from the opening odds
35.9% 64.1%

We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?

Elo ratings

PlayerSurfaceEloRecordMatches
J. Tjen hard1759 106–31137
C. McNally hard1736 85–66151

Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 3, 2026.

Head to head

C. McNally leads 2–0 over 2 meetings. Full record.

DateEventSurfaceWinnerScore
June 23, 2026EastbournegrassC. McNally2 - 1
July 25, 2025W100 EvansvillehardC. McNally2 - 0

Recent form

J. Tjen

L L. Samsonova 0 - 2 Aug. 3, 2026
L A. Kalinskaya 1 - 2 July 30, 2026
W R. Sramkova 2 - 0 July 27, 2026
L D. Kasatkina 1 - 2 July 1, 2026
W L. Fernandez 0 - 2 June 29, 2026

C. McNally

W T. Maria 1 - 2 Aug. 4, 2026
L K. Liutova 2 - 0 July 31, 2026
W Y. Ma 0 - 2 July 30, 2026
W Xiy. Wang 1 - 2 July 28, 2026
L E. Rybakina 0 - 2 July 2, 2026

All June 22, 2026 results & picks →

Full analysis

The mathematical model suggests a 3.0% edge on J. Tjen, but this is driven entirely by an aggressive ML model projection (46.5%) that is a massive outlier compared to the results-based ELO model (19.4%). Qualitative validation reveals Tjen is 1-3 on grass this season with losses to lower-ranked opponents, while the Market Trend framework explicitly warns that Tjen is 'over-priced' because the market is chasing form (+20 drift) despite poor results. With the models in sharp disagreement and market signals contradicting the value pick, the edge is not trusted.