TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. Mikulskyte vs C. Zhao (Wimbledon on 2026-06-23) — the market is efficient, with C. Zhao favoured at 1.48.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | J. Mikulskyte | C. Zhao |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
19.6% | 80.4% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
37.3% | 62.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
32.0% | 68.0% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
38.6% | 61.4% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Mikulskyte | hard | 1499 | 123–96 | 219 |
| C. Zhao | hard | 1451 | 80–96 | 176 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.
J. Mikulskyte leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 23, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | J. Mikulskyte | 2 - 0 |
| W | W. Ewald | 0 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | G. T. Di | 2 - 1 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | A. Herrero Linana | 2 - 0 | July 22, 2026 |
| W | M. Bayerlova | 0 - 2 | July 21, 2026 |
| L | M. Kubka | 2 - 1 | July 19, 2026 |
| L | M. Linette | 1 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| L | E. Jones | 2 - 1 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | L. Stefanini | 2 - 0 | July 9, 2026 |
| L | J. Mikulskyte | 2 - 0 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | C. Naef | 0 - 2 | May 30, 2026 |
All June 23, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used