TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in J. Garland vs T. C. Grant (Wimbledon on 2026-06-24) — the market is efficient, with T. C. Grant favoured at 1.68.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | J. Garland | T. C. Grant |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
49.7% | 50.3% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
48.3% | 51.7% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
47.7% | 52.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
44.8% | 55.2% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Garland | hard | 1677 | 143–69 | 212 |
| T. C. Grant | clay | 1709 | 50–24 | 74 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated March 2, 2026.
T. C. Grant leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 24, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | T. C. Grant | 2 - 0 |
| L | T. C. Grant | 0 - 2 | June 24, 2026 |
| W | C. Naef | 1 - 2 | June 23, 2026 |
| L | R. Montgomery | 2 - 0 | June 7, 2026 |
| W | B. Du Pree | 0 - 2 | June 6, 2026 |
| L | G. Knutson | 2 - 0 | June 2, 2026 |
| L | M. Trevisan | 2 - 0 | July 14, 2026 |
| L | M. Bouzkova | 0 - 2 | July 2, 2026 |
| W | K. Boulter | 0 - 2 | June 30, 2026 |
| W | H. Tan | 0 - 2 | June 25, 2026 |
| W | J. Garland | 0 - 2 | June 24, 2026 |
All June 24, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used