TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in G. Dimitrov vs M. Berrettini (Wimbledon on 2026-07-04) — the market is efficient, with M. Berrettini favoured at 1.80.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | G. Dimitrov | M. Berrettini |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
39.6% | 60.3% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
55.8% | 44.2% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
39.6% | 60.3% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
47.4% | 52.6% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Dimitrov | hard | 1828 | 105–74 | 179 |
| M. Berrettini | hard | 1804 | 70–53 | 123 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated April 4, 2026.
G. Dimitrov leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 4, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | G. Dimitrov | 3 - 2 |
| L | N. Borges | 2 - 0 | July 15, 2026 |
| W | D. Svrcina | 1 - 2 | July 14, 2026 |
| L | A. Fery | 2 - 3 | July 6, 2026 |
| W | M. Berrettini | 3 - 2 | July 4, 2026 |
| W | J. Mensik | 1 - 3 | July 2, 2026 |
| L | M. Navone | 1 - 2 | Aug. 3, 2026 |
| L | G. Dimitrov | 3 - 2 | July 4, 2026 |
| W | A. Fils | 3 - 1 | July 2, 2026 |
| W | S. Wawrinka | 1 - 3 | June 30, 2026 |
| L | M. Arnaldi | 0 - 1 | June 3, 2026 |
All July 4, 2026 results & picks →
═══════════════════════════════════════════════ G. Dimitrov vs M. Berrettini — Wimbledon (grass), 1/16-finals ═══════════════════════════════════════════════ MODELS ELO prob_A 0.3965 → Berrettini (0.60) ML prob_A 0.5584 → Dimitrov (0.56) Model prob_A 0.3965 (math-only, = ELO) Market: Dimitrov 2.00 (imp 0.474) | Berrettini 1.80 (imp 0.526) Value pick B, edge +0.077 (rests entirely on ELO) → SPLIT: ELO+market lean Berrettini, ML leans Dimitrov. No mutual agreement. FORM — DIMITROV (grass) W vs Mensik 1650 (Strong) 7-6 4-6 7-5 6-3 GRIND, 4 sets W vs Sweeny 1750 (Strong) 7-6 6-3 7-5 GRIND (TB) L vs Davidovich-Fokina 1689 3-6 3-6 W vs Shelbayh 1490 (Weak) 6-2 6-4 DOM W vs Polmans 1480 (Weak) 6-1 7-6 GRIND Read: solid Wimbledon path (beat 1650 + 1750), but both wins were grinds. FORM — BERRETTINI (grass) W vs Fils 1721 (Strong) 6-4 7-5 3-6 6-3 GRIND, 4 sets W vs Wawrinka 1511 (Weak) 7-6 7-6 6-7 7-6 EPIC — 4 TB sets, brutal (prior: clay, French QF run in May) Read: grass pedigree + quality win over Fils; Wawrinka match was a physical war. FATIGUE Dimitrov: 5 matches/14d, 530min court, back-to-back Mallorca→Wimbledon, played 07-02 Berrettini: 2 matches/14d, 371min court (185min avg — very grindy), played 07-02 Court-time diff 159min > 60 → nominal edge Berrettini (Dimitrov heavier schedule), BUT Berrettini's two matches were both marathons (Wawrinka = 4 tiebreaks). Edge muddied. NARRATIVE Let-down: none (neither reached a recent Final) Venue: both fresh 2-0 at Wimbledon — venue amplifies nothing Title recency: none VERDICT — PASS Value edge on Berrettini is ELO-only and ML actively contradicts it. Qualitative fatigue read is ambiguous: Dimitrov played more matches, but Berrettini's path (esp. the 4-TB Wawrinka epic) drained similar energy. Market at 1.80/2.00 is balanced and efficient. No clean, model+qualitative-aligned edge → stand down. ═══════════════════════════════════════════════