TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in F. A. Gomez vs C. Tabur (Wimbledon on 2026-06-22) — the market is efficient, with C. Tabur favoured at 1.40.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | F. A. Gomez | C. Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
73.0% | 27.0% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
33.7% | 66.3% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
73.0% | 27.0% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
33.7% | 66.3% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. A. Gomez | clay | 1611 | 131–82 | 213 |
| C. Tabur | clay | 1616 | 156–93 | 249 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.
C. Tabur leads 2–1 over 3 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 22, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | C. Tabur | 2 - 0 |
| March 29, 2026 | Houston | clay | F. A. Gomez | 2 - 1 |
| May 31, 2023 | ITF M25 Carnac Men | clay | C. Tabur | 2 - 1 |
| L | H. Squire | 0 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | J. Choinski | 2 - 0 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| W | M. Pucinelli de Almeida | 1 - 2 | July 31, 2026 |
| W | S. Pieri | 0 - 2 | July 30, 2026 |
| W | M. Schoenhaus | 0 - 2 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | H. Squire | 1 - 2 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | O. Luz | 2 - 0 | July 19, 2026 |
| W | E. Butvilas | 1 - 2 | July 18, 2026 |
| L | A. Rinderknech | 2 - 1 | July 15, 2026 |
| W | J. Rodionov | 2 - 1 | July 13, 2026 |
All June 22, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used