TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in E. Jacquemot vs H. Guo (London on 2026-06-06) — the market is efficient, with E. Jacquemot favoured at 1.61.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Jacquemot | H. Guo |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
42.3% | 57.7% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
28.5% | 71.5% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
35.4% | 64.6% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
57.7% | 42.3% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Jacquemot | hard | 1619 | 102–82 | 184 |
| H. Guo | hard | 1641 | 80–48 | 128 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated Aug. 4, 2026.
H. Guo leads 1–0 over 1 meeting. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 7, 2026 | London | grass | H. Guo | 2 - 1 |
| L | C. Y. Lee | 0 - 2 | Aug. 4, 2026 |
| L | M. Sherif | 2 - 0 | July 23, 2026 |
| W | T. J. Brockmann | 0 - 2 | July 22, 2026 |
| L | C. Burel | 2 - 0 | July 15, 2026 |
| W | I. D. Amariei | 0 - 2 | July 14, 2026 |
| L | K. Day | 0 - 2 | Aug. 1, 2026 |
| L | Xiy. Wang | 2 - 0 | June 23, 2026 |
| W | E. Jacquemot | 1 - 2 | June 7, 2026 |
| L | M. Inglis | 1 - 2 | June 7, 2026 |
| L | M. Kessler | 1 - 2 | May 25, 2026 |
All June 6, 2026 results & picks →
Math-only prediction: no LLM calls used