TennisEdge's AI model finds no betting value in E. Alexandrova vs I. Jovic (Wimbledon on 2026-07-03) — the market is efficient, with I. Jovic favoured at 1.61.
Independent estimates of who wins, each from a different method. The blend is what the bot prices against the market.
| Method | E. Alexandrova | I. Jovic |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratings-based, surface-weighted |
33.5% | 66.5% |
| Machine learning 29-feature gradient-boosted model |
35.4% | 64.6% |
| Serve / return point-by-point simulation |
45.8% | 54.2% |
| Blend what the bot actually prices off |
39.3% | 60.7% |
| Market implied de-vigged from the opening odds |
41.2% | 58.8% |
We publish how well these score against the closing market, including where they lose: how accurate are tennis predictions?
| Player | Surface | Elo | Record | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Alexandrova | hard | 1760 | 103–77 | 180 |
| I. Jovic | hard | 1850 | 69–32 | 101 |
Our own ratings, computed from match results since 2018. Players with fewer than 5 rated matches are omitted rather than shown at a provisional starting value. Last updated July 28, 2026.
Level at 1–1 over 2 meetings. Full record.
| Date | Event | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 3, 2026 | Wimbledon | grass | I. Jovic | 2 - 1 |
| Aug. 28, 2024 | WTA US Open | hard | E. Alexandrova | 2 - 1 |
| L | K. Liutova | 1 - 1 | July 28, 2026 |
| L | I. Jovic | 1 - 2 | July 3, 2026 |
| W | L. Tararudee | 2 - 0 | July 1, 2026 |
| W | P. Udvardy | 2 - 0 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | N. Osaka | 2 - 0 | June 25, 2026 |
| L | J. Pegula | 2 - 1 | July 5, 2026 |
| W | E. Alexandrova | 1 - 2 | July 3, 2026 |
| W | T. Maria | 0 - 2 | July 1, 2026 |
| W | J. Cristian | 0 - 2 | June 29, 2026 |
| L | E. Raducanu | 2 - 0 | June 13, 2026 |
All July 3, 2026 results & picks →
═══════════════════════════════════════════
E. Alexandrova vs I. Jovic — Wimbledon (grass), 1/16-finals
═══════════════════════════════════════════
MODELS
ELO prob_a 0.335 | ML prob_a 0.354 | blended model_prob_a 0.393
Market implied_a 0.412 (de-vigged) | odds A 2.30 / B 1.61
Raw break-even: A 43.5% | B 62.1%
Model gives Jovic 60.7% — BELOW the 62.1% raw break-even at 1.61.
All three models lean Jovic slightly harder than market → but not enough to clear the vig.
FORM
Alexandrova (A): W Tararudee(W,1533) 7-5 7-5 [labored], W Udvardy(W,1549) 6-4 6-2 [DOM],
L Osaka(S,1694) 2-6 2-6, W M.Andreeva(S,1669) 6-3 6-4 [DOM], W A.Li(W) 1-6 7-6 1-6 [GRIND].
Bad Homburg QF then straight into Wimbledon. Grinding out weak opponents.
Jovic (B): W Maria(S,1814) 6-1 6-2 [DOM], W Cristian(W) 7-6 6-0, L Raducanu(S,1800) 2-6 2-6,
W Anisimova(E,1898) 6-2 3-6 6-3 [beat Elite], W Eala(E,1864) 6-2 6-2 [DOM vs Elite], W Ruzic 6-3 6-4.
London SF run + dominant grass results. Clearly the sharper form.
FATIGUE
A: 5 matches/14d, 334 court-min, back-to-back x2, last 07-01.
B: 2 matches/14d, 109 court-min, well-rested-ish, last 07-01.
Court-time diff 225min (>60) → Alexandrova disadvantaged. Fatigue favors Jovic.
NARRATIVE
Let-down: none (no recent Final for either).
Venue: both 2-0 at this Wimbledon; neutral.
Title recency: none.
VERDICT: PASS
Qualitative read strongly favors Jovic — fresher, better form, DOM wins vs Strong/Elite on grass
while Alexandrova labors vs weak fields on a heavy schedule. But Jovic at 1.61 is priced correctly:
model prob 60.7% sits under the 62.1% raw break-even → negative EV. Alexandrova at 2.30 (39.3% vs
43.5% BE) is also -EV. Models and market agree on direction; no price value either side. No bet.